Most differences in results are within chance.They are no grounds for criticising players.

Game · 2023-24 Finals

5/6 Game 2

Kobayashi Go finished 1st (+81.5pt). The game was decided in South 3: Kobayashi Go ron 8,000 from Suzuki Taro, which moved Kobayashi Go's expected points by +30.2.

1st-place probabilityat the start of each hand

0%25%50%75%100%East 1South 1South 4End● Kobayashi Go● Nikaido Rumi● Shibukawa Namba● Suzuki Taro0%25%50%75%100%East 1South 3End● Kobayashi● Nikaido● Shibukawa● Suzuki
The chance of finishing 1st, at the start of each hand (estimated by simulation). Shaded: the hand that decided this game.

Hand by handexpected pt change = how much the hand's result moved the expected final points

HandsResultNikaido Rumi
1st-place chance
Shibukawa Namba
1st-place chance
Suzuki Taro
1st-place chance
Kobayashi Go
1st-place chance
Nikaido Rumi
Expected pt change
Shibukawa Namba
Expected pt change
Suzuki Taro
Expected pt change
Kobayashi Go
Expected pt change
East 1Nikaido Rumi ron 7,700 from Suzuki Taro25%26%24%25%+20.4-2.1-18.5+0.2
East 1, 1 honbaKobayashi Go tsumo 5,20039%24%13%24%-11.2-2.6-1.3+15.1
East 2Kobayashi Go ron 5,200 from Nikaido Rumi31%22%12%35%-11.6-3.5+0.2+15.0
East 3Shibukawa Namba ron 1,000 from Suzuki Taro20%18%12%49%-2.2+5.1-5.6+2.7
East 4Nikaido Rumi tsumo 5,20018%19%9%54%+19.3-3.3-7.2-8.9
South 1Suzuki Taro tsumo 8,00033%18%7%42%-13.0-5.3+18.5-0.2
South 2Nikaido Rumi tsumo 2,00024%17%14%45%+13.4-10.8-3.1+0.5
South 3Kobayashi Go ron 8,000 from Suzuki Taro34%9%13%45%-5.0+1.5-26.7+30.2
South 4Kobayashi Go tsumo 7,80010%2%0%89%-7.0-3.0-2.6+12.6
South 4, 1 honbaKobayashi Go ron 2,900 from Suzuki Taro1%0%0%99%+0.1+1.0-4.4+3.3
South 4, 2 honbaKobayashi Go ron 2,900 from Nikaido Rumi0%0%0%100%-4.7+1.2-0.7+4.3
South 4, 3 honbaKobayashi Go tsumo 3,0000%0%0%100%-1.6-0.6-2.1+4.3
South 4, 4 honbaDraw0%0%0%100%-0.9-1.40.0+2.3
South 4, 5 honbaDraw0%0%0%100%+2.8-1.9-0.7-0.1

All 2023-24 games / This game's record (M League Haifu)