Most differences in results are within chance.They do not justify criticizing players.

Game · 2022-23 Regular Season

2/10 Game 2

Rio Tojyo finished 1st (+89.5pt). The game was decided in East 2: Rio Tojyo tsumo 18,000, which moved Rio Tojyo's expected points by +42.3.

1st-place probabilityat the start of each hand

0%25%50%75%100%East 1East 4South 2End● Rio Tojyo● Takaharu Ooi● Taro Suzuki● Rumi Nikaido0%25%50%75%100%East 1South 1End● Rio● Takaharu● Taro● Rumi
The chance of finishing 1st, at the start of each hand (estimated by simulation). Shaded: the hand that decided this game.

Hand by handexpected pt change = how much the hand's result moved the expected final points

HandsResultTakaharu Ooi
1st-place chance
Rio Tojyo
1st-place chance
Taro Suzuki
1st-place chance
Rumi Nikaido
1st-place chance
Takaharu Ooi
Expected pt change
Rio Tojyo
Expected pt change
Taro Suzuki
Expected pt change
Rumi Nikaido
Expected pt change
East 1Rio Tojyo tsumo 2,70025%23%26%26%-3.6+10.6-4.8-2.3
East 2Rio Tojyo tsumo 18,00022%32%23%24%-16.7+42.3-12.5-13.2
East 2, 1 honbaRio Tojyo tsumo 6,0008%68%12%12%-3.2+12.4-4.6-4.6
East 2, 2 honbaTaro Suzuki tsumo 4,0005%80%7%8%-1.4-4.0+11.4-5.9
East 3Rio Tojyo tsumo 12,0005%79%10%6%-4.6+19.7-13.8-1.4
East 4Rumi Nikaido tsumo 7,8002%95%1%3%-6.6-3.4-6.6+16.6
East 4, 1 honbaExhaustive draw1%92%1%5%-0.6-2.0-2.2+4.9
East 4, 2 honbaRio Tojyo ron 5,200 from Takaharu Ooi1%90%1%7%-11.0+10.8+2.4-2.1
South 1Rumi Nikaido tsumo 3,2000%97%1%2%-6.6-0.2-1.2+8.0
South 2Exhaustive draw0%98%1%2%+0.5+2.3-1.1-1.7
South 2, 1 honbaTakaharu Ooi ron 1,000 from Taro Suzuki0%98%0%1%+1.6-0.5-3.1+2.0
South 3Taro Suzuki ron 1,500 from Takaharu Ooi0%99%0%1%-2.80.0+3.0-0.2
South 3, 1 honbaRumi Nikaido ron 8,000 from Takaharu Ooi0%99%0%1%-13.4-0.1+0.9+12.6
South 4Rumi Nikaido ron 2,900 from Taro Suzuki0%98%0%2%+0.5-0.2-3.7+3.5
South 4, 1 honbaRio Tojyo tsumo 2,0000%98%0%2%-1.4+3.7+0.9-3.2

All 2022-23 games / This game's record (M League Haifu)